Man in Box

Man in Box

Tuesday, June 09, 2015

Father’s Day Blues





Father’s Day Blues
Originally published in the American Men's Studies Association Quarterly, 04 June 2015


After a sojourn as an English professor in Saudi Arabia, looking at Father’s Day tributes on Facebook made me feel blue. Part of this was having lived amongst so many men living alone in Riyadh. Most of the millions of men who worked in that city had traded separation from family for a high wage. These men from Pakistan, India, other parts of the Middle East, Europe, and the U.S. were separated from their children by thousands of miles. The fathers made a sacrifice for the financial security of their families, while living in a place that, more than anywhere else in the world, is inhospitable to single men.


I felt their pain. “I can’t parent on Skype,” I told my Dean. Separated from his own Arab American children, he quoted this often. I left a lot of tax-free money on the table to return to my daughter. However, I could no longer bear living without social access to women and children.



But there was something else to my own “Father’s Day blues.” I read no tributes to my own fatherhood. The separation in Saudi Arabia was just the latest rupture in a Humpty Dumpty relationship with my two eldest children. In the wake of an ugly divorce, I had gained custody in 2002, but they had both chosen to leave my house when they turned twelve. Their mother had poisoned the well, and it has proven impossible to repair the damage.


The years when I was a single father in Oklahoma and Jamaica were perhaps the happiest in my life. Losing my first two children at age 12 scarred me. My children had been coached to see our single-father family as a confinement. I came to feel that the social world in which I lived conspired to make fathers irrelevant. Those of us who attempt to write new scripts often come to feel that we are swimming upstream. In the children’s stories I read with my first two children, the father was almost never present. Was I fated to fulfil the book?


In my own wider family, fathers are still treated as honoured patriarchs. Amongst my scattered circle of liberal friends, there is at least lip service to the importance of fathers. But I came from a very different world, close-knit Christian families who stick to their communities of faith. Having given up that gold standard, then attempting to carve out a non-traditional role of hands-on father-nurturer, I somehow ended up written out of the script as a practicing father to my own children. How did I get here?


Looking at fatherhood through my FB contacts, I could group my friends by decade. There were friends from the 1980s, when I was in the music business in Austin, Texas. There were friends from the 1990s in the San Francisco Bay Area, when I was a grad student. There were friends and colleagues from the first decade of the 21st century, split between Oklahoma City and Jamaica. And then there were recent friends and colleagues from time in Tampa, St Petersburg, and Riyadh.


Then there are family members, conservative Christians in West Texas, or my birth state of Oklahoma. Now the children of my sisters are getting married. I have watched family and cultural dynamics long enough to know that these marriages will last for life. My liberal friends would see them as political enemies, but this conservative Christian culture—the part I see through my extended family--keeps producing straight A students, and “til death do us part” marriages in which the “father knows best” worldview is seldom if ever questioned.


I never fit in that culture. I became a rebel long before I had any clue of what words like rebellion or counterculture meant, long before I had any conscious understanding of why I was wired to push beyond the confinements of a patriarchal culture. As he observed my growing proclivity to question authority in our West Texas cocoon, my father once told me: if you reject your father, you will reject your country, and if you turn against your country, you will turn against God.


At that time I had no thought of being “against God and country.” At age 19, I asked myself this simple question: did God give me my mind to use? When I answered yes, then I walked through a door that did lead me to question all sorts of dogma and conventional wisdom about the fathers of politics and religion. My father’s words came to seem like yet another self-fulfilling prophecy, or an airtight script.


Leaving my father’s house, and soon, his faith, and then his unquestioning patriotism, led to many freedoms. I had successful careers in journalism, song writing, political activism, teaching, and scholarship. But while acquiring a comparative perspective in California, I came to re-evaluate my own Christian family--in particular my father. Although my leftist friends talked a good talk, it was arguably people like my family back in the red states that I would want to have beside me in the trenches.


I gave my children the kinds of cultural literacy I would like to have had. They flourished, while living in my house. But in time, they in turn sought the greater stability of their mother’s house. Neither of my oldest children are religious, or particularly patriotic. Yet I am certain that they see their grandfather as a better man than their father. I myself express this freely: my parents have a giving, loving spirit which is greater than I seem capable of.


All my creative expression and critical thinking is well and good. But critical thinking has a price. Having a father or a husband who routinely thinks outside the box—who lives outside of traditional boxes--may be stimulating at times, but it can also be wearisome. So when I say matter-of-factly that my father is a better man than I, neither wife nor children disagree.


On Father’s Day 2014, my son Samuel at one moment got frustrated and told me that I had never been on his side. This has been his refrain: as a “gifted child” who was at least a year younger than his classmates, he had social problems. But when I simply listened to the reports of his teachers or other parents, he concluded that I did not have his back.


Yet I would hear indirectly through his teachers that he quoted my opinions frequently, and that he clearly admired me.


My oldest daughter Sela seldom talks to me, but seems to see her father, from a great distance, as a mythologized creative and rebellious spirit—a writer—that she now aspires to be.


Writers get to re-write their stories. For fathers, there may not be a second chance. That seems to be a part of the script.


Once when I was trying to rewrite my own script of repeated social conflict, this vision came to voice my aspiration: “The speaker calls attention to the one, and is thereby forgiven for his defects.”


By the one I mean a “greater story” in which we all participate, however defined. As a teacher, or writer, I try to re-direct attention to the “moral of the story,” as it were. I hope that by making meaning come alive, my students and readers will forgive my own limitations. This has usually been the case.


My first two children have proven unforgiving. This is an inheritance I struggle to come to terms with every day. But in my second marriage, I have earned a second chance. I have committed myself to a second incarnation of fatherhood with my second daughter, Safiya. As for the first time around, I want to believe that “time heals all wounds.” But I have left the land of the believers. Rather than putting my faith in miracles, or even redemption, I have settled for indirection. “We’ll understand it all by and by.”
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~



Bio and contact info:




Gregory Stephens is Assistant Professor of English at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez, where his courses include Creative Writing, Post-Apocalyptic Literature and Film, and the “Romance of Revolution in Literature and Film.” Stephens has taught film, literature, and media/cultural studies at the University of South Florida (2010-12) the University of West Indies (2004-08), and the University of California. He is the author of On Racial Frontiers: The New Culture of Frederick Douglass, RalphEllison, and BobMarley (Cambridge UP, 1999). From 2013-2014 Stephens was an Assistant Professor of English at Alfaisal University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Publications drawing on experience in/study of the Middle East include “Recording the Rhythm of Change: A Rhetoric of Revolution in TheSquare,” Bright Lights Film Journal (May 2014), and “Rites of Passage in an English Class: Auto-ethnography and Coming-of-Age storiesin Cross-Cultural Contexts.” Currently, Stephens is finishing a book project: Real Revolutionaries: Revisioning the Romance of Revolution in Literature and Film. Much of his scholarship, and select journalism, is available at: https://uprm.academia.edu/GregorioStephens